[email protected]

国际临床研究杂志

International Journal of Clinical Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2025; 9: (3) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250148 .

Analysis of the impact of emergency nursing fast track on the treatment time and efficacy of acute stroke
急诊护理快速通道对急性脑卒中救治时间及治疗效果的影响分析

作者: 李雅, 杨晶 *

上海市杨浦区市东医院 上海

*通讯作者: 杨晶,单位:上海市杨浦区市东医院 上海;

引用本文: 李雅, 杨晶 急诊护理快速通道对急性脑卒中救治时间及治疗效果的影响分析[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2025; 9: (3) : 124-126.
Published: 2025/3/31 11:25:51

摘要

目的 分析急诊护理快速通道用于急性脑卒中的价值。方法 随机均分2022年9月-2024年8月本院接诊急性脑卒中病人(n=74)。试验组采取急诊护理快速通道,对照组行常规护理。对比救治时间等指标。结果 关于静脉用药时间、急救时间与确诊到抢救时间:试验组(2.29±0.35)min、(51.74±5.34)min、(22.58±2.39)min,对照组(4.74±0.62)min、(65.38±4.04)min、(35.08±4.27)min,差异显著(P<0.05)。家属满意度:试验组97.3%,对照组78.38%,差异显著(P<0.05)。抢救成功率与致残率:试验组100.0%、8.11%,对照组89.19%、29.73%,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 急性脑卒中用急诊护理快速通道,病人的救治时间更短,救治效果也更好,家属满意度更高。

关键词: 急性脑卒中;满意度;急诊护理快速通道;救治时间

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of emergency nursing fast track in the treatment of acute stroke.
Methods Randomly divide acute stroke patients (n=74) admitted to our hospital from September 2022 to August 2024. The experimental group received emergency nursing fast track care, while the control group received routine nursing care. Compare indicators such as treatment time.
Results Regarding the duration of intravenous medication, emergency treatment, and the time from diagnosis to rescue, the experimental group had (2.29 ± 0.35) min, (51.74 ± 5.34) min, and (22.58 ± 2.39) min, while the control group had (4.74 ± 0.62) min, (65.38 ± 4.04) min, and (35.08 ± 4.27) min, with significant differences (P<0.05). Family satisfaction: 97.3% in the experimental group and 78.38% in the control group, with a significant difference (P<0.05). The success rate of rescue and disability rate were 100.0% and 8.11% in the experimental group, and 89.19% and 29.73% in the control group, with significant differences (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The use of emergency nursing fast track for acute stroke patients results in shorter treatment time, better treatment outcomes, and higher satisfaction.

Key words: Acute stroke; Satisfaction; Emergency nursing fast track; Rescue time

参考文献 References

[1] 马丽.急诊护理路径联合循证护理对缺血性脑卒中急诊抢救患者预后及并发症的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2024, 28 (20): 108-110+135.

[2] 占金玲,李娟,祁冬,等.院内一体化急诊护理流程对急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓及预后的影响[J].淮海医药,2024,42(04):421-424.

[3] 裴悦竹.损伤控制理论模型在急性缺血性脑卒患者急诊护理中的应用[J].锦州医科大学学报,2024,45(03):99-103.

[4] 孙伯玉,张鑫,杜莹莹,等.优化急诊护理流程对急性缺血性脑卒中患者救治效果及焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响[J].河北北方学院学报(自然科学版),2022,40(04):32-34+66.

[5] 张颖.急诊护理快速通道对急性脑卒中患者救治时间及效果的影响[J].中国社区医师,2022,38(11):135-137. 

[6] 谢少冰,郑柔娟.优化急诊护理流程在缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓中的应用价值分析[J].基层医学论坛,2024,28 (06): 147-149+153.

[7] 区素宝.急诊护理快速通道对急性脑卒中救治效率的作用研究[J].婚育与健康,2024,30(01):136-138.

[8] 唐泳.急诊护理快速通道在急性脑卒中急救中的应用效果分析[J].中国社区医师,2023,39(07):161-163.

[9] 吴珠娇,温江华,卓剑,等.早期预警分级联合急诊护理绿色通道对急性重症脑卒中患者的效果[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2023,18(01):102-105.

[10] 李文苹. 急救护理快速通道对急性脑卒中患者救治时间与效果的 影响[J]. 中外医学研究,2022,4(18):80-82.