[email protected]

现代社会科学研究

Modern Social Science Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Modern Social Science Research. 2024; 4: (3) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20240069 .

On the boundary of joint drinking tort liability
论共同饮酒侵权责任的边界

作者: 邓志晶 *

贵州财经大学 贵州贵阳

*通讯作者: 邓志晶,单位:贵州财经大学 贵州贵阳;

引用本文: 邓志晶 论共同饮酒侵权责任的边界[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2024; 4: (3) : 199-201.
Published: 2024/12/25 10:49:02

摘要

共同饮酒致损纠纷频发,侵权责任认定复杂。本文深入研究共同饮酒致人损害的侵权责任,明确其需依据过错责任原则判断。在违法行为认定上,强迫性劝酒等行为可认定违法,主观过错判断需综合考虑多种情况。不同劝酒情形下共同饮酒人责任不同,未安全护送也可能承担责任,醉酒者拒绝护送时共同饮酒人应尽告知义务。

关键词: 共同饮酒;侵权责任;赔偿标准

Abstract

Common drinking causes frequent disputes, and the identification of tort liability is complicated. This paper deeply studies the tort liability caused by joint drinking and makes it clear that it should be judged according to the principle of fault liability. In the identification of illegal acts, compulsive drinking and other acts can be identified as illegal, subjective fault judgment needs to consider a variety of circumstances. Under different circumstances, the joint drinkers have different responsibilities, and may also bear the responsibility without a safe escort. When an intoxicated person refuses to escort, the joint drinkers shall have the obligation to inform. Compensation standards include medical expenses and other expenses compensation and death compensation accounting, the proportion of liability to consider the degree of fault and other factors.

Key words: Drinking together; Tort liability; Compensation standard

参考文献 References

[1] 李怡雯.共同饮酒行为中同饮人的注意义务及侵权责任[J].法律适用,2019,(15):54-62.

[2] 李春香,熊静.共同饮酒致人身损害侵权责任纠纷中同饮人责任的裁判规则探析[J].法律适用,2020,(18):61-69.

[3] 杨立新.共同饮酒引发醉酒死亡侵权案件的法律适用界限[J].法律适用,2019,(15):43-53.

[4] 胡岩.共同饮酒法律责任实证研究[J].北方法学,2017, 11(03): 46-56.DOI:10.13893/j.cnki.bffx.2017.03.005.

[5] 冯某与罗某忠、郭某勇等生命权纠纷再审审查民事裁定书.

[6] 康某珍、代某秀等健康权纠纷民事申请再审审查民事裁定书.