Modern Social Science Research
Modern Social Science Research. 2024; 4: (3) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20240061 .
总浏览量: 14
贵州财经大学法学院 贵州贵阳
*通讯作者: 阳富林,单位:贵州财经大学法学院 贵州贵阳;
传统村落作为农耕文明的载体,承载着丰富的历史文化和人文景观,贵州省传统村落的数量位居前茅,传统村落中的历史建筑、人文景观、自然生态环境等环境要素作为传统村落的一部分需要各方主体保护。而行政公益诉讼作为一种保护手段,切实发挥人民检察院督促作用。贵州近年来在传统村落的保护方面拥有众多“第一”,办理了全国首例传统村落保护行政公益诉讼案、发出首份传统村落司法保护令等工作,在强化传统村落环境保护方面取得初步成效。但由于传统村落专项保护工作开展时间较短、专业性要求较强,传统行政管理保护模式不能满足传统村落环境保护的需要,在现实运行中面临诸多掣肘。本文拟通过分析贵州省传统村落法律保护现有模式,以公益诉讼为切入点,分析其背后反映的问题,并提出相应的行政管理和司法保护联动实践优化措施以期在新的时代背景和要求下对传统村落环境的保护贡献更加完善健全的法律服务体系与保障体系。
As the carrier of agricultural civilization, traditional villages carry rich historical, cultural and cultural landscapes. Guizhou Province ranks the top in the number of traditional villages. As part of traditional villages, historical buildings, cultural landscapes, natural ecological environment and other environmental elements in traditional villages need to be protected by all parties. As a means of protection, administrative public interest litigation can effectively exert the supervision role of the people's Procuratorate. In recent years, Guizhou has achieved many "firsts" in the protection of traditional villages, handled the first administrative public interest lawsuit on the protection of traditional villages in China, issued the first judicial protection order for traditional villages, and made initial achievements in strengthening the environmental protection of traditional villages. However, due to the short time for the special protection work of traditional villages and strong professional requirements, the traditional administrative protection mode cannot meet the needs of environmental protection of traditional villages, and it faces many constraints in practical operation. This paper intends to analyze the existing legal protection mode of traditional villages in Guizhou province, take public interest litigation as the starting point, analyze the problems reflected behind it, and propose corresponding optimization measures for the linkage practice of administrative management and judicial protection, so as to improve the legal service system and guarantee system for the contribution of traditional village environment protection under the new era background and requirements.
[1] 吕忠梅,黄凯.探索“行政不作为”公益诉讼新规则——“睢宁油泥案”评析[J].中国法律评论,2020,(05):123-130.
[2] 王明远.论我国环境公益诉讼的发展方向:基于行政权与司法权关系理论的分析[J].中国法学,2016,(01):49-68.
[3] 秦天宝,杨茹凯.系统论视角下检察权与行政权良性互动的实现——以行政公益诉讼诉前程序为场域[J].学术研究,2023,(06):60-67+177.
[4] 胡卫列,方剑明,丁舒.最高人民检察院第二十九批指导性案例解读[J].人民检察,2021,(19):25-30.
[5] 刘艺.行政公益诉讼管辖机制的实践探索与理论反思[J].国家检察官学院学报,2021,29(04):65-84.
[6] 高志宏. 行政公益诉讼中检察机关的角色定位与职能重构[J].南京大学学报 (哲学·人文科学·社会科学), 2023, 60(05): 85-93+158.
[7] 杨武松,尹训洋.国家生态文明试验区环境司法专门化的贵州样态与优化研究[J].贵州社会科学,2022,(12):89-97.
[8] 贵州省黎平县人民法院(2019)黔2631行初7号行政判决书。
[9] 郑晓花.生态环境保护视域下行政管理体制改革理论与实践——评《生态系统方式下的我国环境管理体制研究》[J].科技管理研究,2023,43(17):247.
[10] 薛艳华.国家治理视域下环境行政公益诉讼的社会化拓展[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2023,10(04):70-80.