International Journal of Education
International Journal of Education. 2024; 6: (4) ; 10.12208/j.ije.20240080 .
总浏览量: 104
1东莞理工学院 广东东莞
2东莞职业技术学院 广东东莞
*通讯作者: 李玲玲,单位:东莞理工学院 广东东莞;
本研究聚焦于大学英语课程思政教学的评价问题,借鉴学习投入理论,并结合《大学外语课程思政教学指南》相关要求,构建了一套评价量表。该量表由3个一级指标、6个二级指标以及18个具体评价指标构成,旨在从学生的情感投入、认知投入和行为投入三个方面全面评价大学英语课程思政教学的成效。本研究旨在挖掘影响大学英语课程思政教学效果的关键因素,以期为提升教学效果提供具体建议。采用学习投入理论构建的大学英语课程思政教学评价量表,不仅为准确衡量教学效果提供了量化手段,同时也为提升教学质量和促进学生全面发展指明了路径。
This study focuses on the evaluation of ideological and political education in college English courses. By drawing on the theory of School Engagement and incorporating the relevant requirements of the Guide for Ideological and Political Education in College Foreign Language Courses, a set of evaluation scales has been constructed. This scale consists of three primary indicators, six secondary indicators, and eighteen specific evaluation criteria, aiming to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of ideological and political education in college English courses from three aspects: emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, and behavioral engagement. The purpose of this study is to identify the key factors influencing the effectiveness of ideological and political education in college English courses, with the goal of providing specific suggestions for enhancing teaching effectiveness. The evaluation scale for ideological and political education in college English courses, constructed using the theory of School Engagement, not only provides a quantitative means for accurately measuring teaching effectiveness but also illuminates a path for enhancing teaching quality and fostering comprehensive student development.
[1] 蔡基刚.课程思政与立德树人内涵探索——以大学英语课程为例[J].外语研究,2021,38(03):52-57+112.
[2] 何莲珍.大学外语课程思政之“道”与“术”[J].中国外语,2022,19(04):1+12-14.
[3] 周丽敏,祁占勇.大学外语课程思政教学评价量表开发研究[J].外语界,2023,(03):71-77.
[4] 杨欣.大学英语课程思政教学有效性评价研究[J].南昌师范学院学报,2024,45(03):104-110.
[5] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence [J]. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74(1), 59-109.