International Journal of Clinical Research
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2024; 8: (11) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20240480 .
总浏览量: 89
新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院 新疆乌鲁木齐
*通讯作者： 侯甜,单位：新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院 新疆乌鲁木齐；
目的 分析微课和翻转课堂教学联合用于疼痛康复护理课程中的价值。方法 随机均分2023年9月-2024年8月在本院进行疼痛康复护理课程培训的护生（n=60）。试验组采取微课和翻转课堂教学法，对照组行常规教学。对比教学质量等指标。结果 关于教学质量：试验组高达（97.49±1.64）分，对照组只有（88.43±2.57）分，前者相较于后者更高（P＜0.05）。实践操作和理论知识考核成绩：试验组高达（92.71±2.35）分、（96.48±2.01）分，对照组只有（83.04±3.25）分、（86.59±3.93）分，前者相较于后者更高（P＜0.05）。教学满意度：试验组96.67%，对照组76.67%，前者相较于后者更高（P＜0.05）。结论 疼痛康复护理课程联用微课和翻转课堂教学法，护生的满意度更高，教学质量更好，考核成绩也更加优异。
Objective To analyze the value of micro class and flipped classroom teaching in pain rehabilitation nursing course. Methods Randomized nursing students from September 2023 to August 2024 (n=60). The experimental group adopted the micro-class and the flipped classroom teaching method, and the control group conducted the conventional teaching. Contrast the teaching quality and other indicators. Results About teaching quality: the test group was as high as (97.49 ± 1.64), and only (88.43 ± 2.57) in the control group, the former was higher than the latter (P <0.05). Results of practical operation and theoretical knowledge assessment: the test group was as high as (92.71 ± 2.35) and (96.48 ± 2.01), and the control group was only (83.04 ± 3.25) and (86.59 ± 3.93), the former was higher than the latter (P <0.05). Teaching satisfaction: 96.67% in the test group and 76.67% in the control group, the former was higher than the latter (P <0.05). Conclusion Pain rehabilitation nursing course combines micro class and flipped classroom teaching method, and nursing students have higher satisfaction, better teaching quality and better assessment results.
[1] 阳健美. 疼痛评估标准化情景演绎视频在疼痛护理临床教学中的效果分析[J]. 中国卫生产业,2020,17(10):101-102,105.
[2] 陆世翠,黄晓景,李静丽,等. 微课结合CPC教学模式在疼痛护理临床带教中的应用[J]. 中华疼痛学杂志,2023, 19(4):630-633.
[3] 童莺歌,韩芷晴,薛子豪,等. 疼痛护理学混合式教学课程设计和教学效果分析[J]. 中国高等医学教育,2023(1):58-59.
[4] 廖雨萍,王雨彤,何朝珠,等. 护理硕士专业学位研究生疼痛护理学课程教学改革及效果[J]. 全科护理,2022, 20(29): 4163-4166.
[5] 王柳芬,韦翠花,张婷凤. 进展性案例教学法对疼痛科护理实习生的影响[J]. 中国冶金工业医学杂志,2024, 41(2): 240-241.
[6] 曹进. PBL教学法在癌症疼痛护理带教中的效果观察及知识知晓率影响分析[J]. 中国卫生产业,2020,17(20):140-142.
[7] JINSIL HWARYOUNG SEO, ROHAN CHAUDHURY, JA-HUN OH, et al. Development of Virtual Reality SBIRT Skill Training with Conversational AI in Nursing Education[C]. //Artificial intelligence in education: 24th international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2023), July 3-7 2023, Tokyo, Japan. 2023:701-707.
[8] 刘君清照. 疼痛护理教学中PDCA循环教学法的效果分析[J]. 中国卫生产业,2020,17(21):122-124.
[9] 秦静,邝幼娴,巫丽莎. 疼痛评估标准化情景演绎视频在疼痛护理临床教学中的效果评价[J]. 智慧健康,2019,5(17): 31-32,41.
[10] 刘倩. 观察疼痛护理教学中持续质量改进教学法的效果[J]. 中国卫生产业,2020,17(16):130-132.
[11] 陶静怡,何朝珠,张达颖,等. 微课结合翻转课堂教学在疼痛护理课程中的实践[J]. 护理实践与研究,2023,20(10): 1536-1540.