[email protected]

国际临床研究杂志

International Journal of Clinical Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2024; 8: (5) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20240174 .

Effect analysis of comprehensive nursing intervention in patients receiving tumor chemotherapywith implantable intravenous infusion port
接受植入式静脉输液港肿瘤化疗患者行综合护理干预的效果分析

作者: 胡芳芳 *

上海市光华中西医结合医院 上海

*通讯作者: 胡芳芳,单位:上海市光华中西医结合医院 上海;

引用本文: 胡芳芳 接受植入式静脉输液港肿瘤化疗患者行综合护理干预的效果分析[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2024; 8: (5) : 52-54.
Published: 2024/5/20 9:55:31

摘要

目的 分析综合护理干预用于植入式静脉输液港肿瘤化疗中的价值。方法 随机均分2023年1月-2023年12月本科接诊植入式静脉输液港肿瘤化疗病人(n=64)。试验组采取综合护理干预,对照组行常规护理。对比不良事件等指标。结果 关于不良事件:试验组3.12%,对照组18.75%,比较发现:试验组数据更低(P<0.05)。满意度:试验组96.88%,对照组仅78.12%,比较发现:试验组数据更高(P<0.05)。依从性:试验组达到96.88%,但对照组却仅81.25%,比较发现:试验组数据更高(P<0.05)。结论 植入式静脉输液港肿瘤化疗用综合护理干预,病人的不良事件更少,满意度更高,依从性提升也更加明显。

关键词: 综合护理干预;肿瘤;不良事件;植入式静脉输液港

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of comprehensive nursing intervention for tumor chemotherapy at implantable intravenous infusion port.
Methods From January 2023 to December 2023, patients receiving tumor chemotherapy at the port of implantable intravenous infusion were randomly divided (n=64). The experimental group received comprehensive nursing intervention, and the control group received routine nursing. Adverse events and other indicators were compared.
Results The adverse events were 3.12% in the experimental group and 18.75% in the control group, and the results were lower in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Satisfaction: 96.88% in the experimental group and 78.12% in the control group were found to be higher in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Compliance: The experimental group reached 96.88%, but the control group was only 81.25%, and the data in the experimental group was higher (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   Integrated nursing intervention with implantable intravenous infusion port tumor chemotherapy has fewer adverse events, higher satisfaction, and more obvious improvement in compliance.

Key words: Comprehensive nursing intervention; Tumor; Adverse events; Implantable intravenous infusion port

参考文献 References

[1] 郭莎莉,李莉,周丽娇. 接受植入式静脉输液港肿瘤化疗患者行综合护理干预的效果分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2022, 26(35):114-116. 

[2] 庄黎丽. 综合护理干预对行植入式静脉输液港治疗的肿瘤化疗患者的影响分析[J]. 临床护理研究,2023, 32(20): 86-88.

[3] 庄琳旎. 综合护理干预对行植入式静脉输液港治疗的肿瘤化疗患者并发症与护理满意度的影响[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2017,2(44):101,104. 

[4] 刘 璇,李文娟. 综合护理干预对行植入式静脉输液港治疗的肿瘤化疗患者的影响[J]. 中外医学研究杂志,2023, 2(7):58-60. 

[5] 何倩文,邓红. 综合护理干预对行植入式静脉输液港治疗的肿瘤化疗患者的影响[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊),2020, 27(1):75-76. 

[6] 吴婉梅,黎逢弟,邓金燕,等. 外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与植入式静脉输液港置管在乳腺癌患者中的护理效果对比分析[J]. 医药前沿,2021,11(24):155-156.

[7] 马玉萍. 综合护理干预在肿瘤化疗患者植入式静脉输液港(WAP)中的应用效果分析[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2017,2(11):55,57. 

[8] 冯娜娜,林美华,王彦芬,等 化疗期恶性肿瘤病人植入式静脉输液港感染发生原因分析及其防护措施 . 全科护理, 2021 ,19 (21) :2998-3000.