Analysis of clinical effect of optimizing emergency nursing process intervention in emergency chest pain patients
急诊胸痛病人抢救中采取优化急诊护理流程干预的临床效果分析

摘要

目的 分析急诊胸痛病人抢救中采取优化急诊护理流程干预的临床效果。方法 于我院急诊2022年11月-2023年11月随机选取600例胸痛病人为研究对象，依据双色球法分入两组，即对照组（n=300，应用常规急诊护理）和优化组（n=300，采取优化急诊护理流程干预）。对比两组临床效果。结果 优化组干预后的抢救成功率98.00%，明显高于对照组91.00%，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。优化组干预后的急诊停留（6.51±1.39）min、分诊评估（1.50±0.41）min、住院时间（9.01±2.65）d，明显短于对照组（9.28±2.30）min、（2.63±0.59）min、（13.08±3.12）d，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 急诊抢救胸痛病人时，采取优化急诊护理流程干预，能缩短分诊评估、急诊停留时间，挽救最佳抢救时间。有效提高抢救成功率，并改善预后，缩短住院时间，临床推广价值较高。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the clinical effect of optimizing the emergency nursing flow intervention in emergency chest pain patients.
Methods 600 patients with chest pain were randomly selected in the emergency department of our hospital from November 2022 to November 2023, and were divided into two groups according to the two-color sphere method, namely the control group (n=300, routine emergency nursing) and the optimization group (n=300, optimized emergency nursing process intervention). The clinical effect of the two groups was compared.
Results The rescue success rate of the optimized group was 98.00%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group 91.00%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The duration of emergency stay (6.51±1.39)min, triage evaluation (1.50±0.41)min and hospital stay (9.01±2.65)d after intervention in the optimized group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (9.28±2.30)min, (2.63±0.59)min, (13.08±3.12)d. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion   When rescuing patients with chest pain in the emergency department, the intervention of optimizing the emergency nursing process can shorten the triage evaluation, emergency stay time and save the best rescue time. It can effectively improve the success rate of rescue, improve the prognosis, shorten the hospital stay, and has high clinical popularization value.