Comparison of cold knife conization and cervical ring electrotomy for the treatment of cervical lesions
冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈病变的对比

摘要

目的 分别对宫颈病变实施冷刀锥切术、宫颈环形电切术方法加以治疗，探究其治疗有效性。方法从2022年5月--2023年5月中，筛选50例患者为范例，均诊断为宫颈病变，通过信封盲抽法加以分组，均有25例女性。观察组行宫颈环形电切术展开治疗，对照组行冷刀锥切术加以治疗。比较组间的治疗成效。结果 对照组的临床有效率低于观察组；复发率则相反，数据对比有统计学意义，P＜0.05；临床各项指标则是观察组均低于对照组，P＜0.05。结论 宫颈环形电切术成效更好，能减少手术用时，促进伤口愈合，能最大程度保留患者术后的生育能力，提升总体治疗效果。

Abstract

Objective To treat cold resection and circular resection for cervical lesions and explore their therapeutic effectiveness.
Methods From May 2022 to May 2023,50 patients were screened as samples, all were diagnosed as cervical lesions, and were grouped by envelope blind method with 25 women. The observation group underwent cervical ring resection, and the control group was treated by cold knife conization. To compare the treatment effectiveness between the groups.
Results The clinical response rate of the control group was lower than that of the observation group; the recurrence rate was opposite, and the data were statistically significant, P <0.05; the observation group was lower than that of the control group, P <0.05.
Conclusion   Cervical ring electroresection has better results, which can reduce the surgical time, promote wound healing, maximize the fertility of patients after surgery, and improve the overall treatment effect.