[email protected]

国际临床研究杂志

International Journal of Clinical Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2024; 8: (3) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20240119 .

Clinical efficacy and safety of alteplase in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction
阿替普酶治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效及安全性

作者: 魏立明 *

皋兰县人民医院 甘肃兰州

*通讯作者: 魏立明,单位:皋兰县人民医院 甘肃兰州;

引用本文: 魏立明 阿替普酶治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效及安全性[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2024; 8: (3) : 129-131.
Published: 2024/3/26 16:37:09

摘要

目的 分析在急性脑梗死治疗中应用阿替普酶的治疗效果。方法 择定2021年5月-2023年5月研究时段内在本院就诊的罹患急性脑梗死患者72例作为试验进行对象,以治疗方式的区别、划分36例常规治疗(非溶栓)的患者为对照组,而36例接受了阿替普酶溶栓治疗的患者为观察组,对比两组治疗各个时段的NHISS脑神经缺损评分以及用药的不良反应。结果 两组治疗前,NHISS神经缺损评分无显著差异,P﹥0.05。而在治疗后的6h、24h以及72h患者NHISS评分有明显降低,差异显著P﹤0.05。而在不良反应的对比上,观察组发生症不良反应的人数相较对照组,数值较小,差异不显著,P﹥0.05,结论 阿替普酶可改善急性脑梗死患者的神经受损情况,降低预后康复障碍,同时用药反应较低,治疗安全性好。

关键词: 阿替普酶;急性脑梗死;溶栓;临床疗效;安全性

Abstract

Objective To analyze the efficacy of alteplase in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction.
Methods seventy-two patients with acute cerebral infarction, who were treated in our hospital during the study period from May to 20232021, were selected for the study, according to the difference of treatment methods, 36 patients with conventional therapy (non-thrombolytic therapy) were divided into control group and 36 patients with thrombolytic therapy of alteplase were divided into observation group, the NHISS neurological deficit scale (NDS) and adverse drug reactions (adrs) were compared between the two groups.
Results before treatment, there was no significant difference in NHISS nerve defect score between the two groups (P > 0.05) . The NHISS scores of the patients were significantly decreased at 6H, 24h and 72h after treatment (p < 0.05) . On the side effects, the number of symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, subcutaneous mucosal hemorrhage and oral hemorrhage in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p ﹥ 0.05) .
Conclusion   alteplase can improve the nerve damage of patients with acute cerebral infarction, reduce the prognosis of rehabilitation disorders, and the drug reaction is low, the treatment of safety is good.

Key words: Alteplase; Acute cerebral infarction; Thrombolysis; Clinical efficacy; Safety

参考文献 References

[1] 刘嘉松. 不同剂量阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效及安全性比较[J]. 临床合理用药杂志,2021, 14(25):58-60.

[2] 任宝龙,殷秀萍,杨新萍,等. 急性脑梗死应用小剂量阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中国实用医药,2021,16(21):91-93. 

[3] 吴春贤,王昆峰,蔡亮亮,等. 阿替普酶急诊溶栓治疗超早期急性脑梗死的临床疗效及安全性[J]. 临床合理用药杂志,2021,14(30):1-3,7. 

[4] 杨雪婷,谭磊. 阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效、出血发生情况及安全性分析[J]. 中国实用医药,2021, 16(28):126-128. 

[5] 杨莉. 阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效、出血情况及安全性[J]. 健康必读,2019(20):66.

[6] 张太平. 阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效、出血情况及安全性观察[J]. 中国医药指南,2020,18(6): 51-52.

[7] 张才菊. 阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效及安全性观察[J]. 饮食保健,2019,6(46):49-50.

[8] 张洪全. 观察阿替普酶注射剂联合阿托伐他汀钙片治疗急性脑梗死患者的临床疗效及安全性[J]. 健康必读,2022(21):108-109.

[9] 宁乐馨,李宪东,陈会生. 老年卒中患者阿替普酶和尿激酶静脉溶栓疗效和安全性:INTRECIS研究二次分析[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志,2023,49(2):76-84.