ssr@oajrc.org

现代社会科学研究

Modern Social Science Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Modern Social Science Research. 2024; 4: (1) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20240001 .

The legislation and practice of the qualification of consumer civil public interest litigation in China
我国消费民事公益诉讼原告资格的立法及实践现状

作者: 李炜 *

哈密职业技术学院 新疆哈密

*通讯作者: 李炜,单位:哈密职业技术学院 新疆哈密;

引用本文: 李炜 我国消费民事公益诉讼原告资格的立法及实践现状[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2024; 4: (1) : 1-5.
Published: 2024/2/26 16:35:25

摘要

自2012年我国民事诉讼法系统引入消费民事公益诉讼以来,我国的消费者群体性损害救济情况取得了一定的成效,公益诉讼领域也实现了些许突破。但是,由于相关理论的多样与现实案件的复杂,我们对于消费民事公益诉讼的处理仍存在优化空间。本文以其中的原告资格为切入点,立足于中国具体国情,分别从学理、立法、实践层面探讨消费民事公益诉讼,为未来提出建议和策略奠定坚实的基础。

关键词: 消费民事公益诉讼;原告资格;立法层面

Abstract

Since the introduction of consumer civil public interest litigation in civil procedure law system of China in 2012, the consumer group damage relief has achieved certain effects, and some breakthroughs have been achieved in the field of public interest litigation. However, due to the diversity of relevant theories and the complexity of actual cases, there is still room for optimization in our handling of consumer civil public interest litigation. This article takes the plaintiff's qualifications as the entry point and is based on China's specific national conditions. It discusses consumer civil public interest litigation from the academic, legislative and practical perspectives, laying a solid foundation for future suggestions and strategies.

Key words: Consumer civil public interest litigation; plaintiff qualifications; legislative perspective

参考文献 References

[1] 王涛.我国消费民事公益诉讼原告资格问题研究[D].贵州民族大学,2018.

[2] 章海珠.检察机关提起惩罚性消费民事公益诉讼之探讨[J].社会科学家,2019(07):111-118

[3] 江伟.民事诉讼法[M].高等教育出版社,2007:75.

[4] 刘敏.论诉的利益之判断[J].国家检察官学院学报,2012(4):122-128.

[5] 廖明.律师状告公交公司[N/OL].兰州晨报,(2002-07-08)http://lzcb.gansudaily.com.cn/system/2002/07/08/000010870.shtml.

[6] 韩若男.我国消费民事公益诉讼原告资格制度研究[D].河北经贸大学,2019.