International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; 3: (2) ; 10.12208/j.ijog.20230008 .
总浏览量: 451
四川省乐山市人民医院 四川乐山
*通讯作者: 冯志萍,单位:四川省乐山市人民医院 四川乐山;
目的 研究腹腔镜监护下清宫术在I型和Ⅱ型子宫瘢痕妊娠患者治疗中的疗效评价。方法 回顾性分析我院2019年7月至2020年9月收治的110例I型、Ⅱ型子宫瘢痕妊娠患者(其中34例I型,76例Ⅱ型),均采用腹腔镜监护下清宫的临床治疗效果。结果 I型CSP患者在本次研究中的成功率为94.1%,Ⅱ型CSP患者成功率为100%。均无严重并发症发生,Ⅱ型CSP患者术中出血量较I型CSP患者在统计学上有差异(P=0.028),而住院时间、手术时间及住院费用比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对于I型CSP患者采用腹腔镜监护下清宫治疗手术相对较安全,并发症较少;Ⅱ型CSP患者采用腹腔镜监护下清宫治疗手术手术成功率有一定保障,因术中可再次判断子宫既往瘢痕处病灶情况,且便于子宫瘢痕处病灶大出血情况下的紧急处理。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopically monitored curettage in the treatment of type I and type II cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods 110 cases of type I and type II cesarean scar pregnancy (including 34 cases of type I and 76 cases of type II) admitted to our hospital from July 2019 to September 2020 were retrospectively classified, and all of them were treated with laparoscopically monitored uterine clearance. Results The success rate of type I CSP patients in this study was 94.1%, and that of type II CSP patients was 100%. There were no serious complications. There was a statistically significant difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between type II CSP patients and type I CSP patients (P=0.028), but there was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay, operation time and hospital expenses (P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic curettage for type I CSP patients is relatively safe with fewer complications; The success rate of laparoscopic curettage for patients with type II CSP is guaranteed to some extent, because the condition of previous scar lesions in the uterus can be judged again during the operation, and it is convenient for emergency treatment in the case of massive bleeding in the scar lesions of the uterus.
[1] 潘瑞芹,不同治疗方法对剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的疗效对比[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(22):116-118
[2] 于曼,经阴道手术应用于剖宫产后切口妊娠患者的效果与安全性研究[J].中国性科学,2018,27(8):83-86
[3] 洪菱,王建军,Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型子宫瘢痕妊娠不同手术方式治疗效果的临床研究[J].医学研究杂志, 2019, 48(2): 140-145
[4] 陶春梅,王玉玲,郑玉华等,不同类型子宫疤痕妊娠处理的临床疗效分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究, 2018, 29(7): 936-939
[5] 刘建新,不同治疗方法对剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的疗效对比[J].中国医药指南,2019,17(4):37-38
[6] 唐莉,超声对16例剖宫产术后切口妊娠的诊断分析[J].影像研究与医学应用,2019,3(2):201-202
[7] 许明明,孙晓岩,刘建芬等,超声诊断剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床应用价值[J].现代医用影像学, 2019, 28(9): 2051-2053
[8] 包明义,汪洋,高强度聚焦超声消融治疗子宫切口瘢痕妊娠的疗效分析[J].临床超声医学杂志, 2018, 20(11): 778-780
[9] 王曙光,邓霭辉,黎秀芬,经阴道子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床观察[J].中国实用医药,2018,13(31):73-74
[10] 吴丽平,吴林娟,王彩秀.针对性护理在剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠中的应用分析[J].当代医学, 2017, 23(4): 150-151.
[11] 刘文敏.宫腔镜治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠临床分析[J].中国医疗器械信息,2017,(1):45-46,76.
[12] 马蕊.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的临床诊断和治疗分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(2):109-110.