International Journal of Clinical Research
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2022; 6: (9) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20220451 .
总浏览量: 291
白城市食品药品检验所 吉林白城
*通讯作者： 商丽丽,单位：白城市食品药品检验所 吉林白城；
目的 探讨提高药品含量检测结果有效性的方法与效果。方法 选择四种药品为研究对象，其中运用手动滴定法为对照组，而采用自动滴定法则为观察组，对比分析两种方法的测量精确度。结果 与手动滴定法相比，自动滴定法的精密度较高，比较差异明显（P<0.05）；但是两种方法的药品含量测定对比无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 临床上在测定药品含量时，通过运用自动滴定法，可以提高检测结果的有效性，值得推广。
Objectives To explore the methods and effects of improving the effectiveness of drug content detection results. Methods: Four drugs were selected as the research subjects, with the manual titration method as the control group and the automatic titration method as the observation group to analyze the measurement accuracy of the two methods. Results: Compared with manual titration, the automatic titration was more precise and significantly different (P <0.05); but the drug content measurement of the two methods was not significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion : In the effectiveness of the automatic titration method, it is worth promoting.
[1] Orozco F，C Ｒedondo －Gomez，Vega －Baudrit J Ｒ，et al． On the comparison between diafiltration and isothermal titration calorimetry: Determination of the amount of analytes bound to water－soluble polymers［J].Polyner Testing，2019,76:443-447.
[2] 赵海宇.电位滴定法与手动滴定法测定药品含量的比较[J].质量安全与检验检测,2021,31(03):86-88.
[3] 王慧,马涛.硬化混凝土中酸溶性氯离子手动电位滴定法和自动电位滴定法的比较研究[J].中国建筑金属结构,2021(03):84-85.
[4] 吕小丽,郭平,喻俊磊,郭丹,陈林,张文中.电位滴定法与手动滴定法测定食品添加剂葡萄糖酸钠中主含量的比较[J].中国食品添加剂,2020,31(06):19-22.
[5] 梁永革,李丽.电位滴定法与手动滴定法测定药品含量的比较[J].中国现代医生,2017,55(19):40-42.
[6] Manukyan H，Rodionova E，Zagorodnyaya T， et al． Multiplex PCＲbased titration ( MPBT) assay for determination of infectious titers of the three Sabin strains of live poliovirus vaccine[J].Virology Journal，2019,16（22）：147-151.
[7] 高磊，苏莹，苏畅.八种常见药品含量测定的自动滴定法和手动滴定法对比[J].临床医药文献电子杂志，2020,7（39）：156-158.