[email protected]

国际外科研究杂志

International Journal of Surgical Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Surgical Research. 2022; 5: (3) ; 10.12208/j. ijsr.20220089 .

Efficacy analysis of internal fixation and vertebroplasty for spinal fracture
内固定联合椎体成形术治疗脊柱骨折的临床疗效分析

作者: 王晓楠 *, 何方生, 王春辉, 韩鹏远, 张伟亚

新疆第八师石河子市总医院 新疆石河子

*通讯作者: 王晓楠,单位:新疆第八师石河子市总医院 新疆石河子;

引用本文: 王晓楠, 何方生, 王春辉, 韩鹏远, 张伟亚 内固定联合椎体成形术治疗脊柱骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 国际外科研究杂志, 2022; 5: (3) : 59-61.
Published: 2022/10/28 18:12:10

摘要

目的 分析内固定和椎体成形术联合用于脊柱骨折的价值。方法 2021年4月-2022年4月本科接诊脊柱骨折病人86名,随机均分2组。试验组采取内固定和椎体成形术,对照组行内固定治疗。对比并发症等指标。结果 关于并发症,试验组发生率2.33%,和对照组数据16.28%相比更低(P<0.05)。关于Cobb角,治疗结束时:试验组数据(7.93±1.46)°,和对照组数据(9.35±1.74)°相比更低(P<0.05)。关于住院时间和术中失血量,试验组数据比对照组好(P<0.05)。关于优良率,试验组数据93.02%,和对照组数据76.74%相比更高(P<0.05)。结论 脊柱骨折联用内固定和椎体成形术,并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短,术中失血量更少,Cobb角度改善更加明显,疗效提升更为迅速。

关键词: 脊柱骨折;内固定;住院时间;椎体成形术

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the value of the combined internal fixation and vertebroplasty used for spinal fractures.
Methods: 86 spinal fracture patients were randomly admitted from April 2021 to April 2022. The trial group underwent internal fixation and vertebroplasty, and the control group underwent instrumentation therapy. Compare the complications and other indicators.
Results: Regarding the complications, the incidence rate was 2.33%, even lower than the 16.28% of the data in the control group (P <0.05). Regarding the Cobb angle, at the end of the treatment: the trial group data (7.93 ± 1.46), which was lower than the control group data (9.35 ± 1.74) (P <0.05). For the length of hospitalization and intraoperative blood loss, the test group data was better than the control group (P <0.05). For the comparison rate, the test group data was 93.02%, much higher than 76.74% in the control group (P <0.05).
Conclusion  : Internal fixation and vertebroplasty have a lower complication rate, shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative blood loss, better improvement in Cobb angle, and faster efficacy.

Key words: spinal fracture; internal fixation; length of stay; vertebroplasty

参考文献 References

[1] 朱喆. 后路经椎弓根内固定结合椎体成形术治疗老年胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果研究[J]. 系统医学,2022,7(13):83-86. 

[2] 何传正,向峰,张小卫,等. 内固定术联合椎体成形术在脊柱骨折患者中的应用效果及对其影像学参数、神经功能、脊柱功能的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2022,7(17):101-104. 

[3] SONG,X., WANG,W., YAN,Y., et al. Clinical effect evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with the spinal external fixator for the treatment of osteoporotic compressive fractures with posterior vertebraldefect[J]. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society,2019,23(12):2711-2717. 

[4] 李垠莹. 后路经椎弓根内固定结合椎体成形术治疗老年胸腰段脊柱骨折的方法及临床效果[J]. 养生保健指南,2021(6):31.

[5] 朱海波. 后路经椎弓根内固定结合椎体成形术对老年胸腰段脊柱骨折的治疗价值观察[J]. 健康大视野,2021(12):271.

[6] 尚林. 单纯内固定与内固定结合椎体成形术治疗脊柱骨折对脊椎功能评分及并发症发生率的影响[J]. 中国医学创新,2021,18(5):59-62.

[7] 刘伯昊,霍翰源,古浩坤. 回顾性分析32例脊柱骨折患者接受内固定结合椎体成形术救治的可行性及有效性[J].中国伤残医学,2021,29(6):36-37. 

[8] 阚阔,张仲明,张露,等. 经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术与微创椎弓根钉内固定术治疗脊柱胸腰段压缩性骨折的效果比较[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2022,28(1):136-138.