International Research in Chinese Medicine
International Research in Chinese Medicine. 2022; 2: (3) ; 10.12208/j.ircm.20220070 .
总浏览量: 452
吉林省温泉医院 吉林白山
*通讯作者: 王剑莉,单位:吉林省温泉医院 吉林白山;
目的 探讨在本文研究病例中采取早期康复治疗后发挥的作用。方法 本次研究使用抽样调查的方法选取研究对象,将抽样时间设定在2021年1月到2022年1月,共抽选脑卒中后肩手综合征患者80例。抽样完毕后将所有患者随机分为两组,一组是实验组,一组是对照组,每组40例。对照组采取常规治疗方案,实验组为早期康复治疗。分析两组方法效果差异。结果 接受治疗前,实验组和对照组患者由于受到疾病的侵扰,身心状态较差,生活质量也显著下降,两组患者的数据对比差异较小(P>0.05);实验组和对照组患者在接受治疗后,其临床症状均得到了显著的改善,但从治疗效果方面对比可知,实验组总治疗有效率为93.33%,对照组总治疗有效率为67%,实验组治疗效果显著优于对照组,(P<0.05);并且从生活质量方面进行对比可知,实验组较佳,数据对比差异明显,(P<0.05)。结论 本文病例采取早期康复治疗效果较明显,值得临床采纳。
Objective To explore the role of early rehabilitation treatment in this study. Methods: In this study, 80 patients with shoulder hand syndrome after stroke were selected by sampling survey from January 2021 to January 2022. After sampling, all patients were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group, with 40 patients in each group. The control group was treated with routine therapy, while the experimental group was treated with early rehabilitation. Analyze the difference between the two methods. Results: Before the treatment, the patients in the experimental group and the control group had poor physical and mental status and quality of life due to the interference of diseases, and the difference between the two groups was small (P>0.05); After the treatment, the clinical symptoms of the patients in the experimental group and the control group have been significantly improved. However, from the comparison of treatment effects, the total effective rate of the experimental group is 93.33%, and the total effective rate of the control group is 67%. The treatment effect of the experimental group is significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.05); And from the aspect of quality of life, it can be seen that the experimental group is better, and the data contrast difference is obvious (P<0.05). Conclusion : The early rehabilitation treatment of this case is effective and worthy of clinical adoption.
[1] 沈晓琪.针刺联合康复训练治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征的临床观察[J].中国中医药科技,2021,28(06):976-977.
[2] 胡科,张保朝,樊书领,白方会,刘冠雄.针灸推拿联合康复训练治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征临床研究[J].新中医,2021,53(19):204-207.
[3] 宋国敏,肖剑,叶常青,卢干珍,郑知,龚标.浮针联合普通针刺和康复训练治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征Ⅰ期的临床研究[J].保健医学研究与实践,2021,18(03):76-79+89.
[4] 陈杰夫,徐嘉辉,邱晓佳.平衡针联合康复训练治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征的临床研究[J].中医药导报,2020,26(10):76-79+82.
[5] 司毅龙,曹亚中,周阳.综合康复治疗对脑卒中后肩手综合征的临床效果[J].河南医学研究,2021,30(10):1808-1810.
[6] 张东男,王国辉,刘航.综合康复治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征的效果分析[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2020,8(28):44-45.
[7] 杨红专,惠真珍.综合康复疗法治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征的效果观察[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(03):183-184.
[8] 王明光.脑卒中后肩手综合征的康复治疗护理疗效分析与临床研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(73):66+153.
[9] 钟凤娟,卢佩颖,周骏等.早期功能锻炼在急性脑卒中后肩手综合征患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2018,24(14):1708-1711.
[10] 李向阳.急性脑卒中偏瘫患者肩手综合征的早期康复训练探讨[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(30):57+61.
[11] 郑尚林,黄淑霞,曾爱同等.早期康复治疗对脑梗死偏瘫患者神经、运动功能及生活自理能力的影响[J].保健医学研究与实践,2022,19(05):74-76.