[email protected]

国际医学与数据杂志

International Journal of Medicine and Data

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Medicine and Data. 2022; 6: (5) ; 10.12208/j. ijmd.20220216 .

Investigation on skin injury caused by medical adhesive in critical pregnant women in MICU
危重孕产妇医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤的现况调查

作者: 薛倩 *

西北妇女儿童医院 陕西西安

*通讯作者: 薛倩,单位:西北妇女儿童医院 陕西西安;

引用本文: 薛倩 危重孕产妇医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤的现况调查[J]. 国际医学与数据杂志, 2022; 6: (5) : 109-111.
Published: 2022/10/21 16:09:39

摘要

目的 分析危重孕产妇医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤的现况和预防措施。方法 回顾性分析80例利用医用胶粘剂危重孕产妇临床资料,入院时间均为2020年7月-2022年4月,随机分两组,预防组40例孕产妇,采用预防措施,临床组40例孕产妇,未采用预防措施,比较预防组及临床组孕产妇的皮肤损伤情况。结果 预防组皮肤损伤发生率与临床组比较区别较大,预防组皮肤损伤发生率从表1看出明显低于临床组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。预防组临床症状评分、瘙痒评分、皮损评分与临床组比较区别较大,预防组临床症状评分、瘙痒评分、皮损评分从表2看出明显低于临床组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。预防组情感功能、意识功能、躯体功能、社会功能等评分与临床组比较区别较大,预防组情感功能、意识功能、躯体功能、社会功能等评分从表3看出明显高于临床组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对利用医用胶粘剂危重孕产妇实行预防措施,能够有效降低皮肤损伤发生率,值得临床推广利用。

关键词: 危重孕产妇;医用胶粘剂;皮肤损伤

Abstract

Objective To analyze the current situation and preventive measures of medical adhesive-related skin injury in critical pregnant women in MICU.
Methods The clinical data of 80 critically ill pregnant women with medical adhesive MICU were retrospectively analyzed. The admission time was from July 2020 to April 2022, and they were randomly divided into two groups. 40 pregnant women in the prevention group took preventive measures and 40 pregnant women in the clinical group did not take preventive measures. The skin damage of pregnant women in the prevention group and the clinical group were compared.
Results The incidence of skin injury in the prevention group was significantly different from that in the clinical group, and the incidence of skin injury in the prevention group was significantly lower than that in the clinical group (P<0.05). Compared with the clinical group, the clinical symptom score, pruritus score and skin lesion score of the prevention group are quite different. From Table 2, the clinical symptom score, pruritus score and skin lesion score of the prevention group are obviously lower than those of the clinical group, and the two groups have statistical significance (P<0.05). Compared with the clinical group, the scores of emotional function, conscious function, physical function and social function in the prevention group are quite different. From Table 3, the scores of emotional function, conscious function, physical function and social function in the prevention group are significantly higher than those in the clinical group, and the two groups have statistical significance (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Preventive measures for critical pregnant women using medical adhesive MICU can effectively reduce the incidence of skin injury, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: MICU critical pregnant women; Medical adhesive; Skin injury

参考文献 References

[1] 蔡佩源,孙国珍,李丽,曹文君,谢冬静.中心静脉血管通路装置医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤预防措施的最佳证据总结[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(32):4351-4356.

[2] 闫宗敏.针对患者使用医用胶粘剂相关性预防皮肤损伤效果研究[J].当代临床医刊,2021,34(05):60+59.

[3] 白雪,李丹,李雨欣,郭卫婷,曹英娟.病人医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤危险因素的系统评价[J].全科护理,2021,19(21):3007-3011.

[4] 白雪. 基于VBA编程的患者医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤评估及预防平台的构建[D].山东大学,2021.

[5] 方岚,胡晶,李冬英.结构化护理方案预防ICU患者医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(12):213-216.

[6] 黄少泳,赖海燕,秦丽平,叶夏兰,蓝雪文.神经外科医用粘胶剂相关性皮肤损伤的危险因素研究[J].蛇志,2020,32(03):317-319.

[7] 杨满红,郑玉玲,夏丽娟.1例MARS合并放射性皮炎的护理与分析[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(03):120+127.

[8] 郭卫婷,王文君,曹英娟,米元元,吕晓燕,白雪,杨静.患者医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤预防的最佳证据总结[J].中华护理杂志,2020,55(01):62-67.

[9] 郭卫婷,王文君,白雪,曹英娟.住院患者医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤的危险因素分析及对策[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019(34):4426-4430.

[10] 梁燕,杨蓉,何凌霄,陈德智.皮肤保护膜在预防脑血管造影术患者发生医用胶粘剂相关性皮肤损伤的应用[J].川北医学院学报,2019,34(01):134-136.

[11] 付秀云.医用粘胶剂相关性皮肤损伤的国内外研究现状[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(18):1665-1668.

[12] 葛海娇.医护人员对医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤认知及防控[J].中国城乡企业卫生,2018,33(04):156-158.