[email protected]

现代护理医学杂志

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2022; 1: (4) ; 10.12208/j. jmnm.202200248 .

Effects of azithromycin administration on reducing the incidence of adverse reactions in children
阿奇霉素不同给药方式对降低患儿不良反应发生率的影响

作者: 张建威, 黄桂先, 顾明莉 *

苏州市立医院(东区) 江苏苏州

*通讯作者: 顾明莉,单位:苏州市立医院(东区) 江苏苏州;

引用本文: 张建威, 黄桂先, 顾明莉 阿奇霉素不同给药方式对降低患儿不良反应发生率的影响[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2022; 1: (4) : 151-1533.
Published: 2022/9/2 0:08:54

摘要

目的 探究阿奇霉素给药方式不同对患儿用药不良反应的影响。方法 选取时间 2021 年 2 月到 2022 年 4 月,选自院内急诊科,共 60 人,年龄均小于 12 岁,根据阿奇霉素给药方式的不同分成研究组和 对照组,每组小儿平均 30 人,比对患儿不良反应情况。结果 研究组患儿三项血清炎症因子指标明显下降, 显著低于对照组;研究组用药不良反应发生率为 10.00%,显著低于对照组;研究组患儿住院时长、病症和 体征改善时间均短于对照组,P 值<0.05;研究组治疗显效 20 例、有效 8 例,总有效率显著高于对照组(P <0.05),患儿用药后并未出现重度不良反应。结论 小儿使用阿奇霉素时选择口服给药方式,用药后不良 反应更轻,发生率更低,临床治疗效果更显著。

关键词: 阿奇霉素;给药方式;不良反应;血清炎症因子水平

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of different administration methods of azithromycin on adverse drug reactions in children.
Methods A total of 60 patients, all younger than 12 years old, were selected from the emergency department of our hospital from February 2021 to April 2022. They were divided into study group and control group according to different azithromycin administration methods, with an average of 30 children in each group, and the adverse reactions of the children were compared.
Results Three serum inflammatory factors in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The incidence of adr in the study group was 10.00%, significantly lower than that in the control group. The length of hospitalization and improvement time of symptoms and signs in the study group were shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no severe adverse reactions after treatment.
Conclusion   Oral administration of azithromycin in children has less adverse reactions, lower incidence, and more significant clinical treatment effect.

Key words: Azithromycin; Method of administration; Adverse reactions; Serum inflammatory factor levels

参考文献 References

[1] 管秀峰.阿奇霉素在儿科临床应用中的不良反应与药学观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2021,15(22):217-219.

[2] 陈松.阿奇霉素不同给药方式治疗儿童支原体肺炎的效果分析[J].山西卫生健康职业学院学报,2020,30(04):24-26.

[3] 刘金虹.阿奇霉素用于儿科抗感染的不良反应分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(16):161-162.

[4] 孙娟,殷利平.门冬氨酸阿奇霉素不同给药方式治疗小儿肺炎支原体感染的效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2020,5(23):95-97.

[5] 田发淑.分析阿奇霉素不同途径给药对儿科抗感染患儿临床疗效的影响[J].人人健康,2020(11):290.

[6] 王育红.不同滴注速率对静脉滴注阿奇霉素患儿治疗依从性及不良反应的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(17):3052-3054.

[7] 胡洁.阿奇霉素在儿科应用的不良反应及药学分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019,6(38):164-165.

[8] 武洲.阿奇霉素不同给药方式对降低患儿不良反应发生率的作用分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2019,13(08):124-125.

[9] 唐玲花,薛春兰.阿奇霉素在儿科临床应用中的不良反应思路构建[J].心理月刊,2019,14(03):86.

[10] 宋南燕.阿奇霉素在儿科临床应用中的不良反应和药学分析[J].中国社区医师,2019,35(12):11+13.