[email protected]

国际医学与数据杂志

International Journal of Medicine and Data

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Medicine and Data. 2022; 6: (5) ; 10.12208/j.ijmd.20220191 .

Influencing factors and intervention measures of quality control in Microbiology Laboratory of CDC
疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制影响因素与干预对策

作者: 马超群 *

怀柔区疾病预防控制中心 北京

*通讯作者: 马超群,单位:怀柔区疾病预防控制中心 北京;

引用本文: 马超群 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制影响因素与干预对策[J]. 国际医学与数据杂志, 2022; 6: (5) : 52-55.
Published: 2022/9/10 16:57:28

摘要

目的 研究疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制影响因素与干预对策。方法 选择2020年-2021年本疾控中心医务人员20名,患者100名,按照不同的管理方式分组,常规管理方式为对照组,质量控制管理方式为实验组,分析影响因素和干预措施运用效果。结果 实验组环境因素质量问题占比2/50(4.00%)、仪器因素质量问题占比2/50(4.00%)、样本与试剂因素质量问题占比3/50(6.00%)均低于对照组,P<0.05;实验组医护人员管理质量评分均高于对照组,P<0.05;实验组医护人员安全意识评分均高于对照组,P<0.05。结论 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制影响因素包含环境因素、仪器因素、样本与试剂因素,后提出对应干预对策,质量问题明显降低。

关键词: 疾控中心;微生物实验室;质量控制;影响因素;干预对策

Abstract

Objective: To study the influencing factors and intervention measures of quality control in the microbiology laboratory of the center for Disease Control and prevention.
Methods: from 2020 to 2021, 20 medical staff and 100 patients of the CDC were selected and grouped according to different management methods. The routine management method was the control group and the quality control management method was the experimental group. The influencing factors and the effect of intervention measures were analyzed.
Results: the proportion of environmental factors (4.00%), instrument factors (2 / 50) (4.00%) and samples and reagents (3 / 50) (6.00%) in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); The scores of management quality of medical staff in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05); The scores of safety consciousness of medical staff in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion  : the influencing factors of the quality control of the microbiology laboratory of the center for Disease Control and prevention include environmental factors, instrument factors, samples and reagents. After the corresponding intervention measures are put forward, the quality problems are significantly reduced.

Key words: CDC; Microbiology Laboratory; Quality Control; Influencing factors; Intervention measures

参考文献 References

[1] 董兴华. 微生物实验室的质量控制现状[J]. 中国城乡企业卫生,2021,36(2):60-62. 

[2] 李小利,苏领彦,吴劲. 210份样本微生物检验质量管理效果分析[J]. 中国校医,2022,36(5):396-398.

[3] 潘新明. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制的影响因素及对策分析[J]. 当代医学,2022,28(2):7-9. 

[4] 胡平. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制影响因素及应对方法分析[J]. 保健文汇,2022,23(15):160-162.

[5] 张宝泽,宋燕. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制影响因素及解决对策[J]. 健康大视野,2022(10):268-269. 

[6] 姚淑英,张远斌,聂永红. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制影响因素与解决措施分析[J]. 中国社区医师,2021,37(15):186-187. 

[7] 高迎春. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制的影响因素与措施[J]. 药店周刊,2021,30(30):141.

[8] 张娜. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制的影响因素及对策分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2020,20(77):157-158. 

[9] 李秀梅,郭文娟,张蕊. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制的影响因素及对策分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2020,20(12):161,163. 

[10] 皇甫素慧. 疾控中心微生物实验室质量控制的影响因素及对策分析[J]. 临床检验杂志(电子版),2020,9(1):12-14.