Contemporary Nursing
Contemporary Nursing. 2021; 2: (6) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20210155 .
总浏览量: 363
河北衡水武强县医院 河北衡水
*通讯作者: 张晓燕,单位:河北衡水武强县医院 河北衡水;
目的 分析护理干预用于肾衰竭血液净化的价值。方法 2020年5月-2021年10月本科接诊肾衰竭病人56名,都予以血液净化治疗。随机均分2组:试验组采取护理干预,对照组行常规护理。对比SDS评分等指标。结果 关于并发症,试验组的发生率3.57%,和对照组25.0%相比更低(P<0.05)。关于SDS和SAS评分,在干预结束之时:试验组的数据分别是(31.23±3.64)分、(33.57±3.95)分,和对照组(44.65±4.36)分、(46.28±4.91)分相比更低(P<0.05)。关于满意度,试验组的数据100.0%,和对照组78.57%相比更高(P<0.05)。结论 肾衰竭血液净化治疗用护理干预,负性心理缓解更为迅速,并发症预防效果更好,满意度改善更为显著。
Objective: To analyze the value of nursing intervention for blood purification of renal failure. Methods: From May 2020 to October 2021,56 kidney failure patients were received by undergraduate treatment, all of whom were given blood purification treatment. Randomized and evenly divided into 2 groups: the trial group took nursing intervention, and the control group underwent routine care. Contrast the SDS score and other indicators. Results: Regarding complications, the incidence rate was 3.57% and was lower than 25.0% in the control group (P <0.05).For SDS and SAS scores, at the end of the intervention, the data were (31.23 ± 3.64), (33.57 ± 3.95), and the control group (44.65 ± 4.36) (P <0.05), (46.28 ± 4.91), respectively. Regarding satisfaction, the test group data was 100.0%, higher than 78.57% in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion : Nursing intervention of renal failure has shown more rapid negative psychological relief, better complication prevention effect, and better satisfaction improvement.
[1] 杨琳,刘萌,张文静. 护理干预在血液净化治疗肾衰竭中的应用分析[J]. 饮食保健,2021(3):181.
[2] 金晨霞,李贵平. 护理干预在血液净化治疗肾衰竭患者中的运用[J]. 家有孕宝,2021,3(6):271.
[3] 杨琳,张文静. 护理干预在血液净化治疗肾衰竭中的应用分析[J]. 饮食保健,2021(2):168.
[4] 翟莉华. 护理干预在血液净化治疗肾衰竭中的应用价值体会[J]. 健康大视野,2021(14):150.
[5] 黄亚萍. 系统性责任制护理干预在慢性肾衰竭患者序贯血液 净化治疗中的应用[J]. 中外医疗,2020, 39 (19):138-140.
[6] 张晓媛. 无缝隙护理干预在心力衰竭合并急性肾衰竭患者连续性血液净化中的应用效果观察与探讨[J]. 饮食保健,2020,7(23):174-175.
[7] 彭竹枝. 连续性血液净化治疗肾衰竭合并重症心力衰竭的临床价值及护理干预分析[J]. 当代临床医刊,2019, 32(6):576-577.
[8] 蒋继珂. 系统性责任制护理干预在慢性肾衰竭患者序贯血液净化治疗中的应用[J]. 河南医学研究,2019, 28(19):3618-3619.