Application effect of cognitive behavior intervention in nursing of hospitalized patientswith coronary heart disease
认知行为干预在住院冠心病患者护理中的应用效果观察

摘要

目的 分析认知行为干预用于住院冠心病护理的价值。方法 对2020年8月-2022年7月本科接诊住院冠心病病人（n=72）进行随机分组，试验和对照组各36人，前者采取认知行为干预，后者行常规护理。对比SDS评分等指标。结果 关于冠心病认知度：试验组数据（89.42±4.18）分，和对照组（70.26±5.17）分相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于SDS和SAS评分，在干预结束时：试验组数据分别是（29.15±3.41）分、（31.54±3.92）分，和对照组（42.58±4.79）分、（44.71±5.26）分相比更低（P＜0.05）。关于LEVF和sf-36评分，在干预结束时：试验组的数据都比对照组高（P＜0.05）。关于满意度，试验组的数据97.22%，和对照组80.56%相比更高（P＜0.05）。结论 住院冠心病护理用认知行为干预，效果显著，负性情绪缓解更为迅速，心功能改善更加明显，满意度也更高，生活质量更好。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of cognitive behavior intervention in hospitalized coronary heart disease nursing.
Methods From August 2020 to July 2022, 72 undergraduate inpatients with coronary heart disease (n=72) were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 36 patients in each group. The former received cognitive behavioral intervention, while the latter received routine nursing. Compare SDS score and other indicators.
Results Regarding CHD awareness, the score of the experimental group (89.42±4.18) was higher than that of the control group (70.26±5.17) (P < 0.05). At the end of the intervention, the scores of SDS and SAS in the experimental group were (29.15±3.41) and (31.54±3.92), respectively, which were lower than those in the control group (42.58±4.79) and (44.71±5.26) (P < 0.05). With respect to LEVF and SF-36 scores, at the end of the intervention: data were higher in the trial group than in the control group (P < 0.05). As for satisfaction, the data of the experimental group was 97.22%, which was higher than that of the control group (80.56%) (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   The effect of cognitive behavior intervention in hospitalized coronary heart disease nursing is significant, the negative emotion is relieved more quickly, the improvement of heart function is more obvious, the satisfaction is higher, and the quality of life is better.